|
|
Gianluca Gambarini
University of Siena,Dept. of Dental Materials
Torsional and cyclic fatigue testing of profile niti
rotary instruments.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study is twofold: first to test Maillefer Profile
.04 and .06 instruments for number of revolution to separation and maximum
torque at failure,according to testing procedures described in ANSI/ADA
Specification no.28. Second,to compare results with those obtained using
a cyclic fatigue test, which is considered a more appropriate method for
evaluating the dynamic characteristics of engine-driven rotary instruments.
240 Maillefer Profile .04 and .06 Tapers,NiTi instruments in sizes 15
through 40 were investigated and compared . The results indicated that
all measurements exceeded the ANSI/ADA Specification No.28 minimum average
values for resistance to failure by twisting tests. Data obtained from
the cyclic fatigue test showed that increased taper and larger diameters
resulted in higher instrument stress and,consequently, fewer cycles to
failure. No correlation was noted between data recorded from static (ANSI/ADA)
and dynamic (cyiclic fatigue) tests. A new specification (No.101) is therefore
needed to control the quality, dimensions and mechanical properties of
NiTi rotary files, in which test methods and minimum strength requirements
for instruments having design,dimension or materials which are not included
in the above-mentioned Specification No.28 should be precisely estabilished.

Fig.1: Fatigue test device

Fig.2: Artificial canal
Introduction
The dimensional and physical performance requirements for endodontic instruments
designed to prepare the root canals are listed in ANSI/ADA Specifications
Nos. 28-58 and ISO 3630/1 (1,2). For some decades all of these instruments
have been fabricated from stainless steel.Meanwhile,manufacturers have
marketed a great number of new instruments, based on different cross-sectional
shapes and design concept,to alleviate some of the clinical difficulties
encountered in instrumentation procedures, such as ledging,canal transportation
(zip and elbow) or straightening the curved canals.Many of these procedural
errors were caused by the stiffness of the alloys used,which increased
with increasing instrument size (3). These modifications have consisted
in changes in design,which also had a significant effect on instrument's
physical and mechanical characteristics (4).
A more recent innovation has been the replacement of stainless steel
(SS) with a nickel-titanium alloy (NiTi), which has a very low modulus
of elasticity. NiTI files have been shown to exhibit a greater degree
of elastic flexibility in bending and torsion, as well as superior resistance
to torsional fracture,when compared with SS files manufactured with the
same process (5).These characteristics give NiTi endodontic files a greater
ability to negotiate curved canals,to reduce the tendency of iatrogenic
errors and to allow larger apical preparations of curved canals while
maintaining the original path (6).
Thanks to the favourable mechanical properties of the alloy, NiTi instruments
are rapidly becoming very popular and new, innovative engine-driven rotary
systems using NiTi instruments of various design have been developed during
recent years to facilitate cleaning and shaping procedures (7-9). Maillefer
Profile .04 and .06 Series (Maillefer SA, Baillagues,Switzerland) are
nickel-titanium rotary instruments with an increased taper (double or
triple the standard 0.02 mm),and a unique geometry specifically designed
to minimize instrument stress and maximize efficiency ( 8).
When new root canal instruments with a design which differs markedly
from conventional files are produced, several characteristics need to
be investigated and tested to allow an efficient and safe clinical usage.
Although some mechanical testing have been previously performed on NiTi
files, results have been controversial and dependent mainly on instrument's
type and design (10-13). Moreover,ANSI/ADA Specification No.28 is not
considered an appropriate test of the dynamic characteristics of engine-driven
rotary instruments,because it does not consider fatigue and breakage of
rotary instruments operated in flexed conditions while preparing curved
canals (14). Therefore,there is a clear need for the development of a
test protocol for these innovative NiTi rotary instruments.
A new ANSI/ADA Specification No.101 is currently being developped to
specify requirements and test methods for mechanically operated instruments
for root canal preparation having designs or materials which are not included
within the provisions of the above-mentioned ANSI/ADA Specification No.28.
Generally this specification will include root canal instruments having
2% tapers with diameter sizes not included within Specification Nos. 28
and 58, root canal instruments having tapers other than 2% and root canal
instruments having other shapes.
On these bases, the purpose of the present study is twofold: first to
test Maillefer Profile .04 and .06 instruments for number of revolution
to separation and maximum torque at failure,according to testing procedures
described in ANSI/ADA Specification no.28. Second,to compare results with
those obtained using a new test method (resistance to cyclic fatigue )
, which is considered a more appropriate procedure for evaluating the
dynamic characteristics of engine-driven rotary instruments.
Materials and methods
240 Maillefer Profile .04 and .06 Tapers,NiTi instruments in sizes
15 through 40 were investigated and compared based on ANSI/ADA Specification
No.28 for K-type instruments (Table 1) and on a new test method for evaluating
resistance to fracture. Twenty instruments of each size were tested for
resistance to fracture by twisting and for the cycic fatigue test. For
the twist test ( maximum torque and angular deflection at failure), in
order to insert the instruments into the apparatus, each handle was removed
where it met the shaft. The shaft end was then inserted in a chuck connected
to an electric motor , revolving at 2.0 rpm ( Baure CM 2024, St.Aubin,Switzerland).
Three millimiters of the tip were clamped in another chuck connected to
a digital torque meter memocouple ( Maillefer SA,Baillagues,Switzerland
) and to a strip chart for recording . The test apparatus was able to
measure maximun torque with an accuracy of +/- 1 gm-cm and angular deflection
with an accuracy of +/- 2 degrees.
Cyclic fatigue studies were performed using a specifically developped
test apparatus ( Maillefer SA,Baillagues,Switzerland ),that allowed free
rotation of the instruments within an experimental stainless steel canal.
A variable speed motor was set to operate at 350 rpm and the shaft of
the rotary instruments were gripped in the chuck of the motor (Fig 1).
Ten instruments of each size were tested in a selected canal shape (90°
canal curvature with a 5 mm. radius of curvature) at the selected speed
Each instrument was placed at the same depth within the artificial stainless-steel
canal (Fig.2) and operated to failure. The time of instrument failure
was determined by visual inspection and recorded. The number of cycles
to failure was calculated from the rpm data by multiplying the rpm by
the time to failure.
All data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significance
was determined at the 95% confidence level.
| Size |
Bending Moment
no. at 45° (gr-cm)
Maximum |
Torque at Failure
(gr-cm)
Minimum |
Revolution at Failure
(degrees)
Minimum |
| 15 |
50 |
8 |
360 |
| 20 |
80 |
18 |
360 |
| 25 |
120 |
30 |
360 |
| 30 |
150 |
45 |
360 |
| 35 |
190 |
65 |
360 |
| 40 |
250 |
100 |
360 |
Table 1: ANSI/ADA specification
no.28 standard values
| Profile.04 |
Mean |
SD |
Profile.06 |
Mean |
SD |
| Size 15 |
24.77 |
3.66 |
Size 15 |
43.63 |
4.52 |
| Size 20 |
38.62 |
3.94 |
Size 20 |
65.43 |
5.48 |
| Size 25 |
56.99 |
5.37 |
Size 25 |
87.21 |
7.35 |
| Size 30 |
84.54 |
4.80 |
Size 30 |
129.64 |
10.36 |
| Size 35 |
131.49 |
9.64 |
Size 35 |
193.73 |
18.79 |
| Size 40 |
171.43 |
14.41 |
Size 40 |
234.76 |
17.40 |
Table 2: Means and standard deviationsfor
torque at failure (gm-cm)
| Profile.04 |
Mean |
SD |
Profile.06 |
Mean |
SD |
| Size 15 |
522.72 |
80.06 |
Size 15 |
525.01 |
130.30 |
| Size 20 |
560.25 |
85.93 |
Size 20 |
507.16 |
66.41 |
| Size 25 |
501.76 |
69.40 |
Size 25 |
445.96 |
75.24 |
| Size 30 |
480.04 |
53.32 |
Size 30 |
538.17 |
108.27 |
| Size 35 |
657.90 |
101.47 |
Size 35 |
516.08 |
87.39 |
| Size 40 |
573.14 |
101.25 |
Size 40 |
581.68 |
89.14 |
Table 3: Means and standard deviations
for angular deflection at failure ( in degrees)
| Profile.04 |
Mean |
SD |
Profile.06 |
Mean |
SD |
| Size 15 |
684 |
120 |
Size 15 |
618 |
54 |
| Size 20 |
619 |
79 |
Size 20 |
534 |
63 |
| Size 25 |
613 |
105 |
Size 25 |
463 |
59 |
| Size 30 |
544 |
68 |
Size 30 |
500 |
53 |
| Size 35 |
548 |
94 |
Size 35 |
401 |
57 |
| Size 40 |
501 |
85 |
Size 40 |
222 |
83 |
Table 4: Means and standard deviations
for cycles to failure
Second part >
|
|
Would you like
to co-operate with us?
The invitation is for all the collegues who
wish to develop a specific subject or present clinical case-reports
of particular interest in the field of Restorative Dentistry,
Endodontics and Periodontics.
Texts and photographic- radiographics material
must comply with the Instructions
to Authors.
Further request for information and explanation,
or suggestions of scientific articles/papers about subjects
different from the above mentioned ones, may be sent direct
to dental-smile@bec.it
|
|
|